[{"content":" Photo by Simon Felix\n","date":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","image":"/p/bienvenue/DSCF7695.webp","permalink":"/p/bienvenue/","title":"Bienvenue sur mon site internet !"},{"content":"Description La pair-aidance en santé mentale, c\u0026rsquo;est le soutien apporté par des personnes ayant elles-mêmes vécu des difficultés psychiques à d\u0026rsquo;autres personnes dans des situations similaires1. En France, la pair-aidance se développe notamment sous une forme professionnalisée, avec des formations diplômantes, et son importance commence à être de plus en plus reconnue dans les politiques publiques2,3. En effet, les impacts positifs de la pair-aidance pour les personnes accompagnées sont aujourd’hui bien documentés : amélioration du rétablissement personnel, réduction des hospitalisations et de l’auto-stigmatisation, etc.4 Mais qu\u0026rsquo;en est-il de son impact dans les équipes qui accueillent et travaillent avec un pair-aidant ?\nC\u0026rsquo;est précisément cette question que le programme de recherche PACTE (« Pair-Aidance, Collaboration et Transformation des Equipes ») cherche à explorer. Son objectif : faciliter le déploiement de la pair-aidance professionnelle en santé mentale. Pour cela, nous voulons mieux comprendre comment l\u0026rsquo;intégration d\u0026rsquo;un pair-aidant professionnel peut transformer les équipes d\u0026rsquo;accompagnement en santé mentale — leurs représentations, leurs pratiques, ou encore leur façon de travailler ensemble. A plus long terme, le projet permettra de développer des recommandations et des formations pour mieux soutenir l’intégration de pairs-aidants professionnels dans les équipes.\nLa particularité du projet PACTE : PACTE est un projet de recherche participatif, entièrement coconstruit avec les acteurs de terrain. Pour cela, le projet est réalisé au sein de la Communauté Mixte de Recherche sur la Pair-Aidance en Santé Mentale (CMR-PASM) de l’Université de Bordeaux, qui réunit tout au long du processus des personnes concernées, des pairs-aidants professionnels, des professionnels de santé mentale, des chercheurs et des acteurs institutionnels. Cette démarche de recherche-action participative garantit que les questions posées et les connaissances produites seront directement utiles aux acteurs du terrain.\nCe sur quoi nous travaillons maintenant : La première étude du projet, PACTE Interview, est actuellement en cours. À travers des entretiens collectifs (focus groups) auprès de professionnels de santé mentale — dont des pairs-aidants professionnels —, nous cherchons à explorer comment le travail quotidien avec un pair-aidant est vécu et perçu dans les équipes. Est-ce que cela change le regard des professionnels sur la santé mentale et le rétablissement ? Est-ce que cela modifie leurs pratiques au quotidien ?\nPublications Aucune publication pour le moment.\nFinancements \u0026amp; partenaires Projet financé par la Région Nouvelle Aquitaine.\nRecherches menées au Laboratoire de Psychologie (UR4139) de l\u0026rsquo;Université de Bordeaux, sous la direction du Pr Antoinette PROUTEAU.\nBibliographie Davidson L, Chinman M, Sells D, Rowe M. Peer Support Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Report From the Field. Schizophr Bull. 1 juill 2006;32(3):443‑50. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj043\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nHAS. Note de cadrage : Pair-aidance dans les organisations sanitaires, sociales et médico-sociales. Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS); 2025. Rapport No.\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nOMS. Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Guidance and technical packages on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches [Internet]. Geneva: Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS); 2021 [cité 14 mai 2022]. Rapport No. Disponible sur: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341648\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nCooper RE, Saunders KRK, Greenburgh A, Shah P, Appleton R, Machin K, et al. The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review. BMC Medicine. 29 févr 2024;22(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\n","date":"2026-03-03T00:00:00Z","image":"/projets/pacte/BUILDING.webp","permalink":"/projets/pacte/","title":"Programme de recherche PACTE"},{"content":"Description Le rétablissement personnel, c\u0026rsquo;est l\u0026rsquo;idée qu\u0026rsquo;une personne vivant avec un trouble de santé mentale peut retrouver une vie épanouissante et pleine de sens, indépendamment de la simple réduction des symptômes1. Cette approche, recommandée par l\u0026rsquo;Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, place la personne au cœur de son propre parcours de soin2. En France, elle peine encore à s\u0026rsquo;imposer dans les pratiques professionnelles et les politiques publiques.\nC\u0026rsquo;est pour changer cela que le programme de recherche RECOR a été lancé. Son objectif : produire des connaissances concrètes pour aider les professionnels et les services de santé mentale à mieux intégrer cette approche dans leur quotidien.\nCe que nous avons fait jusqu'ici : Dans un premier temps, nous avons développé des outils de mesure adaptés au contexte français. Nous avons mené une revue de littérature pour identifier les outils pour mesurer le rétablissement personnel, et évaluer leur qualité scientifique3. Il existait très peu d\u0026rsquo;instruments validés en français pour évaluer le rétablissement ou mesurer à quel point un service de soin intègre vraiment cette notion dans son offre de soin. Nous avons donc adapté et validé deux questionnaires4,5 qui permettent aujourd\u0026rsquo;hui de mieux évaluer ces dimensions, aussi bien pour la recherche que pour améliorer les pratiques.\nDans un second temps, nous avons mené une grande enquête nationale auprès de professionnels de santé mentale6 pour comprendre comment ils mettent concrètement en œuvre les pratiques orientées rétablissement — à titre individuel, mais aussi au sein de leur structure. Les résultats ont mis en lumière des facteurs clés qui favorisent ou freinent ces pratiques, et permettent d\u0026rsquo;identifier des pistes concrètes de formation et d\u0026rsquo;amélioration.\nCe sur quoi nous travaillons maintenant : Nous explorons actuellement les représentations et croyances que différents acteurs ont du rétablissement (personnes concernées, familles et proches, professionnels). Que signifie \u0026ldquo;se rétablir\u0026rdquo; pour chacun d\u0026rsquo;eux ? Partagent-ils la même vision, ou existe-t-il des décalages ? Mieux comprendre ces représentations permettra d\u0026rsquo;adapter les accompagnements et de favoriser un dialogue plus riche entre toutes les parties prenantes.\nPublications (Felix, 2025) Ma thèse de Doctorat en Psychologie sur le sujet\n(Felix, 2024) Article théorique sur le lien entre approche centrée sur le rétablissement et approche centrée sur les droits\n(Felix et al., 2024) Revue systématique des mesures du rétablissement personnel\n(Munuera et al., 2024) Validation en français du QPR-Fr, une mesure du rétablissement personnel\nFinancements \u0026amp; partenaires Projet financé par le Centre Hospitalier de Jonzac.\nRecherches menées au Laboratoire de Psychologie (UR4139) de l\u0026rsquo;Université de Bordeaux, sous la direction du Pr Antoinette PROUTEAU.\nMerci à tous les partenaires qui ont contribué à concevoir et/ou diffuser les études :\nCentre Collaborateur de l\u0026rsquo;OMS (EPSM Lille-Métropole) Clubhouse de Bordeaux Comité de Pilotage de l\u0026rsquo;étude RECOR-PRO CRPS/C2RP de la Tour de Gassies, Bruges Equipe mobile ESPPAIR - Centre Hospitalier de Jonzac Equipe du SAMSAH - Centre Hospitalier de Jonzac Laboratoire de Psychologie UR4139, Université de Bordeaux Un Chez Soi d\u0026rsquo;Abord Bordeaux Métropole \u0026hellip; Bibliographie Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 1993;16(4):11‑23. doi:10.1037/h0095655\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nOMS. Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Guidance and technical packages on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches [Internet]. Geneva: Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS); 2021 [cité 14 mai 2022]. Rapport No. Disponible sur: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341648\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nFelix S, Valery KM, Caiada M, Guionnet S, Bonilla-Guerrero J, Destaillats JM, et al. Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties. Clin Psychol Rev. 13 juin 2024;112:102459. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459 PubMed PMID: 38943916.\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nMunuera C, Felix S, Prouteau A, Caiada M, Guionnet S, Valéry KM, et al. Characterizing personal recovery in severe mental illness: French psychometric validation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr). Psychiatr Rehabil J. 4 avr 2024. doi:10.1037/prj0000601 PubMed PMID: 38573671.\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nFelix S, Munuera C, Seguela A, Fombouchet Y, Caiada M, Guionnet S, et al. Capturing Lived Experience of Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Care: Psychometric Validation of the French Recovery Self-Assessment Scale (RSAR-Fr). (sous presse).\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\nFelix, S., Caiada, M., Seguela, A., Guionnet, S., Tison, E., Valéry, K.-M., et al. Two levels, two logics ? Exploring predictors of recovery-oriented practices: findings from the RECOR-PRO survey. (en préparation).\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\n","date":"2026-03-03T00:00:00Z","image":"/projets/recor/RECOR.webp","permalink":"/projets/recor/","title":"Programme de recherche RECOR"},{"content":"En Février, j\u0026rsquo;ai été invité pour participer à l\u0026rsquo;émission de radio FATAL MENTAL, diffusée par Campus FM. L\u0026rsquo;occasion de me prêter à l\u0026rsquo;exercice (peu évident) de vulgariser la notion de rétablissement des troubles psychiques en une vingtaine de minutes. J\u0026rsquo;ai pu parler des travaux menés dans notre équipe de recherche, en tentant de répondre au mieux aux questions préparées par mon hôte Michel HESS.\nJ\u0026rsquo;espère que cela pourra participer à informer et à sensibiliser autour de cette notion si importante, qui porte la promesse d\u0026rsquo;accompagnements en santé mentale davantage centrés sur les besoins et projets des personnes concernées !\nEncore merci à Michel pour cette expérience rafraîchissante, et à l\u0026rsquo;association ESMF Entraide Santé Mentale France1 qui porte ce projet d\u0026rsquo;émission.\nPour écouter l\u0026rsquo;émission Votre navigateur ne supporte pas la lecture audio. 🔗 Ecouter l\u0026rsquo;émission sur le site de Campus FM\n🔗 Ecouter l\u0026rsquo;émission sur le site de ESMF Entraide Santé Mentale France\nESMF Entraide Santé Mentale France (www.esmfentraide.org). \u0026ldquo;C\u0026rsquo;est une association loi 1901 gratuite d\u0026rsquo;aide face à la souffrance et les troubles psychiques, grâce à des ateliers en distanciel par visio, l\u0026rsquo;apprentissage de compétences, du soutien et avec des pairs-aidants bénévoles.\u0026quot;\u0026#160;\u0026#x21a9;\u0026#xfe0e;\n","date":"2026-02-25T00:00:00Z","image":"/blog/fatalmental/microphone.webp","permalink":"/blog/fatalmental/","title":"Emission de radio FATAL MENTAL sur le rétablissement"},{"content":"Auteurs Meryl Caiada, Antoinette Prouteau, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Justin Lamontagne, Emma Tison, Kevin-Marc Valery, Luc Vigneault, Tania Lecomte\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI) face pervasive stigma, with damaging effects on their intimate lives. Although evidence suggests individuals might endorse stereotypes about their romantic relationships, no tool has addressed self-stigma in this domain. This study aimed to develop and validate the Intimate Relationship Self-Stigma Scale (IRSS), specifically, to determine its structural and construct validity, as well as the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. This instrument was co-constructed with peer support workers living with SMI. Using a bipolar semantic differential format, the IRSS captures both self-stigmatizing beliefs and positive self-perceptions. Items were generated through focus groups and literature review. Participants with SMI (N = 150) completed the IRSS online, along with measures of internalized stigma, self-esteem, and romantic functioning. Exploratory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure-Disclosure Effects, Self-Attractiveness, Stability, and Intimacy Needs-explaining 48.6% of the variance. Subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (ω = .69-.87), test-retest reliability (ICC = .79-.93), and expected correlations with related constructs. The IRSS fills a critical gap in recovery-oriented mental health care by providing a comprehensive assessment of internalized stigma in romantic contexts while simultaneously capturing positive self-perceptions. Further validation, including confirmatory factor analyses and cross-cultural validity, is warranted.\nRéférence complète Meryl Caiada, Antoinette Prouteau, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Justin Lamontagne, Emma Tison, Kevin-Marc Valery, Luc Vigneault, Tania Lecomte (2026). Measuring intimate relationship self-stigma in serious mental illness: scale development and validation. Journal of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2595604\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Journal of Mental Health H-index 112 Impact Factor (2 ans) 2.09 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2026-01-02T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/measuring-intimate-relationship-selfstigma-in-seri/","title":"[Caiada et al., 2026] - Measuring intimate relationship self-stigma in serious mental illness: scale development and validation"},{"content":"Auteurs Kevin-Marc Valery, Manon Laumier, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Meryl Caiada, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Sarah Guionnet, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Antoinette Prouteau\nRéférence complète Kevin-Marc Valery, Manon Laumier, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Meryl Caiada, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Sarah Guionnet, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Antoinette Prouteau (2026). Facteurs influençant le recours aux soignants chez l’adolescent en détresse psychique : une étude participative en méthode mixte. Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2024.12.009\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique H-index 35 Impact Factor (2 ans) 0.18 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/facteurs-influenant-le-recours-aux-soignants-chez-/","title":"[Valery et al., 2026] - Facteurs influençant le recours aux soignants chez l’adolescent en détresse psychique : une étude participative en méthode mixte"},{"content":"Le 10 Décembre 2025, j\u0026rsquo;ai eu l\u0026rsquo;honneur d\u0026rsquo;être invité pour une table ronde lors de la 8e Journée de l\u0026rsquo;ACCompagnement et de l\u0026rsquo;action médico-sociale (JACC) du Congrès Français de Psychiatrie.\nLa thème de la table ronde étant la recherche participative, c\u0026rsquo;était l\u0026rsquo;occasion pour moi de présenter la Communauté Mixte de Recherche sur la Pair-Aidance en Santé Mentale (CMR-PASM) au sein de laquelle je mène des recherches sur la pair-aidance. J\u0026rsquo;ai pu décrire le fonctionnement de la structure, et la manière dont cela transforme nos pratiques de recherche. Nous avons discuté des enjeux et avantages de cette approche participative.\nLa rediffusion est disponible en ligne sur le site du e-CFP 🔗\nMerci aux autres invités, Philippe Chervin (FIRAH), Yves Bancelin (ESPER-Pro) et Ismaël Bechla (ENS Lyon) pour ces échanges passionnants.\nEt merci aux organisateurs, Valérie Paparelle (La Nouvelle Forge) et Bernard Pachoud (Université Paris Diderot) pour l\u0026rsquo;invitation ! Au plaisir de renouveler l\u0026rsquo;expérience.\n","date":"2025-12-10T00:00:00Z","image":"/blog/table-ronde-jacc/JACC-CFP.webp","permalink":"/blog/table-ronde-jacc/","title":"Table Ronde sur la Recherche Participative"},{"content":"Auteurs Kevin-Marc Valery, Sarah Guionnet, Pauline Boivert, Julien Bonilla-Guerreo, Meryl Caiada, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Pascal-André Berrier, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article The Clubhouse Bordeaux initiative, a community of individuals with direct experience of mental health services, decided to identify and examine positive experiences in order to enhance the provision of care that aligns with the preferences of service users. The aim of this study was twofold: firstly, to identify the professional practices and skills that mental health service users consider to be useful, and secondly, to assess the relative importance of these practices and skills in terms of frequency of occurrence. A survey was conducted online with the objective of gathering information from psychiatric service users in France. The content of the survey was developed through a participatory, user-led study approach. A total of 128 users participated in the survey. Ten practices, such as user involvement in decision-making, accurate diagnosis, person-centered support, and clear information about care, were identified as useful. Similarly, ten professional skills, including trust, empathy, honesty, transmission of hope, and belief in the potential for recovery, were also considered beneficial. However, it was observed that few service users reported frequently benefiting from these practices and skills. The results indicate that service users seek professionals who are both experts in providing support and trusted equals who facilitate their empowerment. Implementing these practices and skills in clinical practice could better align with the preferences expressed by service users.\nRéférence complète Kevin-Marc Valery, Sarah Guionnet, Pauline Boivert, Julien Bonilla-Guerreo, Meryl Caiada, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Pascal-André Berrier, Antoinette Prouteau (2025). Quelles compétences professionnelles et pratiques utiles devrait-on retrouver chez les soignants en santé mentale : une étude en méthode mixte dirigée par des usagers. L\u0026rsquo;Encéphale. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2024.12.006\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal L Encéphale H-index 57 Impact Factor (2 ans) 0.85 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2025-12-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/quelles-comptences-professionnelles-et-pratiques-u/","title":"[Valery et al., 2025] - Quelles compétences professionnelles et pratiques utiles devrait-on retrouver chez les soignants en santé mentale : une étude en méthode mixte dirigée par des usagers"},{"content":"Auteurs Yasuhiro Kotera, Akemi Hara, Christopher Newby, Yuki Miyamoto, Akihiko Ozaki, Yumna Ali, Pamela Clinton, Simon Felix, Catherine John, Natthapon Inta, Mike Slade\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article This study developed and evaluated a new personal recovery scale—Global INSPIRE—in English and Japanese, and compared responses between Japan and the UK. Personal recovery—living a satisfying and meaningful life despite mental health challenges—has gained attention in mental health. The widely-used CHIME framework identifies five recovery processes: Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment. Full INSPIRE evaluates whether service users feel supported in each CHIME process. However, emerging cross-cultural evidence indicates differences in the priority placed on each CHIME domain. No tool exists to assess recovery priorities, hindering cross-cultural research. The 20-item self-completed Global INSPIRE was adapted from the Full INSPIRE to assess recovery priorities of both service users and non-service users. Participants in the UK (n = 512) and Japan (n = 507) completed the Global INSPIRE at baseline and two-week follow-up. Psychometric properties were evaluated, including reliability, test-retest stability, and discriminant validity with two established recovery scales—CORE-10 and QPR-15. Cross-national differences in recovery priorities were also examined. Both versions showed excellent reliability (α = 0.91 UK; 0.97 Japan), test-retest stability (4/5 processes UK, 5/5 Japan), and acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.80 UK; 0.85 Japan). Measurement invariance supported configural (CFI = 0.89) and metric invariance (CFI = 0.89) but not scalar invariance (CFI = 0.83). Discriminant validity was supported by weak correlations with CORE-10 and QPR-15. UK participants prioritised Hope, Meaning, and Empowerment, while Japanese participants prioritised Identity. Global INSPIRE is a reliable and culturally adaptable tool for assessing distinct recovery priorities. Future research should explore demographic differences and expand testing across diverse cultural contexts. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-025-02946-9.\nRéférence complète Yasuhiro Kotera, Akemi Hara, Christopher Newby, Yuki Miyamoto, Akihiko Ozaki, Yumna Ali, Pamela Clinton, Simon Felix, Catherine John, Natthapon Inta, Mike Slade (2025). Development and evaluation of a mental health recovery priority measure for cross-cultural research: global INSPIRE. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02946-9\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology H-index 197 Impact Factor (2 ans) 2.21 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/development-and-evaluation-of-a-mental-health-reco/","title":"[Kotera et al., 2025] - Development and evaluation of a mental health recovery priority measure for cross-cultural research: global INSPIRE"},{"content":"Auteurs Yasuhiro Kotera, Amy Ronaldson, Simran Takhi, Simon Felix, Mariam Namasaba, Simon Lawrence, Vanessa Kellermann, Agnieszka Kapka, Daniel Hayes, Danielle Dunnett, Tesnime Jebara, Michio Murakami, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy, Clara De Ruysscher, Lene Eplov, Charlotte Toernes, Dagmar Narusson, Bernd Puschner, Ramona Hiltensperger, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Trude Gøril Klevan, Hannah Morland-Jones, Edith Moore, Samson Tse, Michael Ryan, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Charlotte Hanlon, Laura Asher, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Susana Ochoa, Jonna Tolonen, Ashleigh Charles, Mário Andrade, Daniel Elton, Peter Bates, Julie Cooper, Jason Grant, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Recovery colleges (RCs) support personal recovery through education, skill development and social support for people with mental health problems, carers and staff. Guided by co-production and adult learning principles, RCs represent a recent mental health innovation. Since the first RC opened in England in 2009, RCs have expanded to 28 countries and territories. However, most RC research has been conducted in Western countries with similar cultural characteristics, limiting understanding of how RCs can be culturally adapted. The 12-item Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing (RECOLLECT) Fidelity Measure (RFM) evaluates the operational fidelity of RCs based on 12 components, but cultural influences on these components remain underexplored. To assess associations between Hofstede\u0026rsquo;s cultural dimensions and RFM items to identify cultural influences on fidelity components. A cross-sectional survey of RC managers was conducted across all 221 RCs. Mixed-effects regression models examined associations between Hofstede\u0026rsquo;s country-level cultural dimensions and item-level RFM scores, adjusted for healthcare expenditure and income inequality. Four cultural dimensions, obtained from Hofstede, were analysed: individualism (prioritising personal needs), indulgence (enjoyment-oriented), uncertainty avoidance (preference for predictability) and long-term orientation (future-focused). The RFM was completed by 169 (76%) RC managers. Seven RFM items showed associations with cultural dimensions. Equality was linked to short-term orientation, while learning was associated with individualism and uncertainty avoidance. Both individualism and indulgence influenced co-production and community focus. Commitment to recovery was shaped by all four cultural dimensions, with the strongest associations seen for individualism and indulgence. Individualism enhanced explicit focus on strengths-based practice, while uncertainty avoidance influenced course distinctiveness. This study demonstrates how culture shapes RC fidelity components, providing actionable insights for cultural adaptation. Incorporating under-represented dimensions, such as collectivism and restraint, could improve the RFM\u0026rsquo;s global applicability, facilitating implementation. Future research should explore cultural nuances, engage diverse stakeholders and refine fidelity measures to enhance RC inclusivity and effectiveness worldwide.\nRéférence complète Yasuhiro Kotera, Amy Ronaldson, Simran Takhi, Simon Felix, Mariam Namasaba, Simon Lawrence, Vanessa Kellermann, Agnieszka Kapka, Daniel Hayes, Danielle Dunnett, Tesnime Jebara, Michio Murakami, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy, Clara De Ruysscher, Lene Eplov, Charlotte Toernes, Dagmar Narusson, Bernd Puschner, Ramona Hiltensperger, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Trude Gøril Klevan, Hannah Morland-Jones, Edith Moore, Samson Tse, Michael Ryan, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Charlotte Hanlon, Laura Asher, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Susana Ochoa, Jonna Tolonen, Ashleigh Charles, Mário Andrade, Daniel Elton, Peter Bates, Julie Cooper, Jason Grant, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade (2025). Cultural influences on fidelity components in recovery colleges: a study across 28 countries and territories. General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2024-102010\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal General Psychiatry H-index 46 Impact Factor (2 ans) 6.54 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/cultural-influences-on-fidelity-components-in-reco/","title":"[Kotera et al., 2025] - Cultural influences on fidelity components in recovery colleges: a study across 28 countries and territories"},{"content":"Auteurs Kevin-Marc Valery, Simon Felix, Meryl Caiada, Thomas Fournier, Sarah Guionnet, Adrien Seguela, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Despite the international incentives and the worldwide development of recovery-oriented policies, it has proven challenging to establish recovery-oriented mental health services that take into account users\u0026rsquo; subjectivity and perspectives (Slade et al., World Psychiatry 13(1):12-20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20084 ). The objective of this study was to identify individual beliefs that are correlated with six recovery-oriented practices in schizophrenia among mental health professionals. Seven individual beliefs were examined for their association with each of the aforementioned practices: belief in recovery possibilities, biological beliefs, desire for social distance, perceived similarities, professional utility beliefs, continuum beliefs, and categorical beliefs. The results indicated that belief in the possibility of recovery from schizophrenia and professional efficacy beliefs were the most strongly associated with the six recovery-oriented practices examined. Conversely, there was a negative association between stigma score (desire for social distance) and the six recovery-oriented practices. The remaining four beliefs-biological, perceived similarity, categorical, and continuum-were found to be more weakly associated with recovery-oriented practices. In light of these findings, it is evident that mental health professionals\u0026rsquo; individual beliefs warrant further consideration in research endeavors aimed at fostering and facilitating the implementation of recovery-oriented practices.\nRéférence complète Kevin-Marc Valery, Simon Felix, Meryl Caiada, Thomas Fournier, Sarah Guionnet, Adrien Seguela, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Antoinette Prouteau (2025). The Power of Beliefs in Recovery-Oriented Practice: A Brief Report from the STIGMAPRO Survey. Community Mental Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01437-6\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Community Mental Health Journal H-index 116 Impact Factor (2 ans) 1.47 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2025-01-07T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/the-power-of-beliefs-in-recoveryoriented-practice-/","title":"[Valery et al., 2025] - The Power of Beliefs in Recovery-Oriented Practice: A Brief Report from the STIGMAPRO Survey"},{"content":"Auteurs Meryl Caiada, Kevin-Marc Valery, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Emma Tison, Maxime Gonin, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Nicolas Pillaud, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Discrimination in intimate relationships (IR) is frequently reported among persons with schizophrenia. Despite ongoing effort of international organizations to combat mental illness stigma, there remain a limited understanding of specific IR-related stereotypes. The study aimed to i) identify the stereotypes related to IR of persons with schizophrenia held by Mental Health Professionals (MHP), health students and the general population, and ii) explore the effects of several factors associated with these stereotypes. This study used a mixed-methods approach. A survey developed collaboratively with persons with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE) was disseminated among MHP, health students and the general population. The majority of the nine IR-related stereotypes previously identified by PWLE were endorsed by the participants (N = 532). PWLE were perceived as particularly incompetent in the domain of IR (e.g. to achieve couple project). Stereotypes endorsement varied among the groups. Continuum beliefs, perceived similarities and recovery beliefs were negatively associated with stereotype endorsement. The general population, MHP and health students endorsed several stereotypes regarding IR of persons with schizophrenia. The results provide support for the role of theoretical beliefs in IR stigmatization, suggesting they may be relevant targets for evidence-based stigma reduction programs.\nRéférence complète Meryl Caiada, Kevin-Marc Valery, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Emma Tison, Maxime Gonin, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Nicolas Pillaud, Antoinette Prouteau (2025). Stigmatizing intimate relationships in schizophrenia: a study comparing mental health professionals, health students and the general population. Journal of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390378\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Journal of Mental Health H-index 112 Impact Factor (2 ans) 2.09 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2025-01-02T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/stigmatizing-intimate-relationships-in-schizophren/","title":"[Caiada et al., 2025] - Stigmatizing intimate relationships in schizophrenia: a study comparing mental health professionals, health students and the general population"},{"content":"Auteurs Kevin-Marc Valery, Adrien Seguela, Meryl Caiada, Justine Dubos, Alexia Ducasse, Justine Duffa, Chloé Dumora, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Mathilde Guillet, Sarah Guionnet, Manon Laumier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Maika Violet, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Recent research and the majority of neuropsychological testing manuals emphasize the importance of establishing a proper relationship between the evaluator and the evaluatee. However, there is relatively little empirical research on this point. The objective of this study was to operationalize empathy in the evaluator/evaluatee relationship during neuropsychological assessment. The subsequent aim was to determine the impact of this empathy on the evaluator/evaluatee relationship and cognitive performance. The participants, designated as \u0026ldquo;evaluatees\u0026rdquo;, were randomly assigned to complete a brief neuropsychological test in either an empathic (N = 47) or neutral condition (N = 47). The neuropsychological tests included the Stroop task from the GREFEX battery, the Letter-Number Sequencing from the WAIS-IV, and the d2 test of attention. Following the tests, participants completed scales indicating perceived relationship with the evaluator, lived experience of the test, and sociodemographic information. The manipulation check indicated that it was possible to manipulate empathy. Evaluators demonstrating empathy led to a better evaluator/evaluatee relationship. However, the results regarding cognitive performance were less consistent. In conclusion, there is a need for improvement in clinical neuropsychological practice with regard to relational competencies during testing. This study proposes benchmarks to make the evaluator\u0026rsquo;s empathy perceptible. This technique has not been shown to have a consistent effect on cognitive performance.\nRéférence complète Kevin-Marc Valery, Adrien Seguela, Meryl Caiada, Justine Dubos, Alexia Ducasse, Justine Duffa, Chloé Dumora, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Mathilde Guillet, Sarah Guionnet, Manon Laumier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Maika Violet, Antoinette Prouteau (2024). Humanizing neuropsychological assessment: The role of empathy. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Applied Neuropsychology Adult H-index 50 Impact Factor (2 ans) 1.05 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2024-10-30T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/humanizing-neuropsychological-assessment-the-role-/","title":"[Valery et al., 2024] - Humanizing neuropsychological assessment: The role of empathy"},{"content":"Auteurs Simon Felix, Kevin-Marc Valery, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Personal recovery represents a paradigm shift in mental healthcare. Validated self-report outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to facilitate the transformation towards recovery-oriented practices and services. Objectives were to identify published measures and analyze their measurement properties using a standardized methodology. Following the COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of personal recovery PROMs in serious mental illness. The MEDLINE, PMC, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PBSC and Scopus electronic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and February 2024. Full-text articles from a previous systematic review were also examined. 91 studies were included in the review, describing 25 PROMs. Ten of them had not been identified in previous reviews. Quality of evidence was globally poor for most PROM measurement properties. Very little evidence was found for cross-cultural validity, measurement invariance, measurement error and criterion validity. The Recovery Assessment Scale and Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery showed the strongest evidence for sufficient psychometric data on a wide range of measurement properties. Several personal recovery measures are now available. While research is still needed to enhance their validity on some psychometric properties, the current tools appear sufficient to cover most research and clinical needs.\nRéférence complète Simon Felix, Kevin-Marc Valery, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau (2024). Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties. Clinical Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Clinical Psychology Review H-index 334 Impact Factor (2 ans) 6.65 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/personal-recovery-selfreport-outcome-measures-in-s/","title":"[Felix et al., 2024] - Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties"},{"content":"Auteurs Caroline Munuera, Simon Felix, Antoinette Prouteau, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Kévin-Marc Valéry, Yoann Fombouchet, Sébastien Gard, François Chevrier, Isabelle Minois, Katia M\u0026rsquo;bailara\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article The support of the personal recovery of people with lived experience of mental illness is a major issue in clinical practice. Thus, a valid instrument to assess personal recovery is needed. The present study aimed to validate the French translation of the 22-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr). A convenience sample of 222 participants reporting a severe mental illness diagnosis was recruited online. Psychometric properties of the QPR-Fr were evaluated. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for structural validity. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed. To test for convergent validity, we conducted multiple linear regression analysis to explore the QPR-Fr associations with psychological distress and the CHIME framework (with Connectedness, Hope and optimism about the future, Identity, Meaning in life, and Empowerment) proxy measures (perceived social support, hope, self-esteem, quality of life, and empowerment). An adequate fit was found for a 19-item unidimensional factor structure. Internal consistency was excellent. Test reliability was good. The QPR-Fr total score was significantly positively associated with quality of life, hope, self-esteem, and social support satisfaction and negatively associated with psychological distress. No significant association was found with social support availability nor with empowerment. This study provides additional data to support the cross-cultural validity of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery. The QPR-Fr is a valid and reliable tool to assess personal recovery. Practitioners could use the QPR-Fr to assess personal recovery in collaboration with people with lived experience. Convergent validity with CHIME proxy measures supports the validity of the CHIME framework in a French cultural context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\nRéférence complète Caroline Munuera, Simon Felix, Antoinette Prouteau, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Kévin-Marc Valéry, Yoann Fombouchet, Sébastien Gard, François Chevrier, Isabelle Minois, Katia M\u0026rsquo;bailara (2024). Characterizing personal recovery in severe mental illness: French psychometric validation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr).. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000601\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal H-index 94 Impact Factor (2 ans) 0.78 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/characterizing-personal-recovery-in-severe-mental-/","title":"[Munuera et al., 2024] - Characterizing personal recovery in severe mental illness: French psychometric validation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr)."},{"content":"Auteurs K.-M. Valery, M. Roulin, M. Caiada, S. Felix, S. Guionnet, E. Tison, T. Fournier, L. Violeau, L. Chadapeaud, J.-B. Pachnopoulos, A. Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Cette étude avait pour objectif d’identifier le contenu du stéréotype de l’enfant ayant un diagnostic de trouble du déficit de l’attention avec/sans hyperactivité (TDAH) chez les psychologues cliniciens spécialisés en neuropsychologie français puis d’identifier les facteurs associés à une représentation stéréotypée du TDAH.Une enquête en ligne a été conduite en France auprès de 88 psychologues cliniciens spécialisés en neuropsychologie travaillant avec des enfants ayant un diagnostic de TDAH. Les stéréotypes ont été identifiés à l’aide d’échelles sémantiques différentielles. En accord avec le modèle du Contenu du Stéréotype, sept stéréotypes de « compétence » et sept stéréotypes de « chaleur » ont été évalués. Les facteurs individuels potentiellement associés aux stéréotypes étaient les suivants : croyances catégorielles et continuum, croyances dans les possibilités de haute qualité de vie, sentiment d’utilité professionnelle et similitudes perçues. Des facteurs sociodémographiques ont également été recueillis. En comparaison avec les enfants neurotypiques, les participants se représentaient les enfants ayant un diagnostic de TDAH comme étant davantage en difficultés pour se concentrer, moins compétents pour maîtriser leurs émotions, plus extravertis, plus irritables, plus insolents, moins compétents pour entretenir des relations amicales, moins compétents scolairement, plus compétents sportivement, plus chaleureux et plus arrogants. Plus les participants se percevaient similaires aux enfants ayant un diagnostic de TDAH et moins ils rapportaient eux-mêmes de stéréotypes. Les psychologues cliniciens spécialisés en neuropsychologie ayant le moins d’années d’expérience, les plus souvent en contact avec les enfants ayant un diagnostic de TDAH et en travaillant en libéral ont rapporté une vision plus stéréotypée du TDAH. Alors même que les psychologues cliniciens spécialisés en neuropsychologie sont des acteurs importants dans l’accompagnement du TDAH, de nombreux stéréotypes se retrouvent dans leur représentation des enfants accompagnés. Ces fausses croyances ainsi que les leviers anti-stigma sont discutés.\nRéférence complète K.-M. Valery, M. Roulin, M. Caiada, S. Felix, S. Guionnet, E. Tison, T. Fournier, L. Violeau, L. Chadapeaud, J.-B. Pachnopoulos, A. Prouteau (2024). Les stéréotypes sur l’enfant ayant un diagnostic de TDAH chez les neuropsychologues en France. Neuropsychiatrie de l\u0026rsquo;Enfance et de l\u0026rsquo;Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurenf.2024.04.002\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence H-index 29 Impact Factor (2 ans) 0.11 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2024-06-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/les-strotypes-sur-lenfant-ayant-un-diagnostic-de-t/","title":"[Valery et al., 2024] - Les stéréotypes sur l’enfant ayant un diagnostic de TDAH chez les neuropsychologues en France"},{"content":"Auteurs Meryl Caiada, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Kevin-Marc Valery, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article Although persons with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) express a need for intimate relations with others, they still suffer from a severe lack of social participation in this domain. However, these unmet needs have received little attention until recently. This study reviews interventions that aim to facilitate the development and the maintenance of intimate relationships (IR) of persons with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Studies published in Scopus, PubMed, EBSCO (Psych INFO, Psych ARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection) from January 1, 2000, to December, 2021, were screened. The search using terms referring to \u0026ldquo;schizophrenia\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;bipolar disorder\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;major depression\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;IR\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;interventions\u0026rdquo; revealed 11 studies. Among them, 10 reported interventions for persons with depression, including 9 for couple therapy. Most interventions targeted satisfaction with couple relationships as the main therapeutic objective. Heterogeneity in study design precludes any firm conclusions about their efficacy. Interestingly, only one intervention focused on single persons interested in developing IR. The results highlight the lack of interventions: (i) aimed at promoting IR, (ii) designed for single persons, and (iii) targeting persons with psychotic disorders. This result may reflect the persisting stigmatization of persons with psychotic disorders, and the taboo associated with the IR and sexuality of persons with mental illness. Further studies are needed to develop inclusive interventions promoting the development of IR in persons with mental illness.\nRéférence complète Meryl Caiada, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Kevin-Marc Valery, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau (2024). Promoting Intimate Relationships in Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Interventions. Community Mental Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01204-z\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Community Mental Health Journal H-index 116 Impact Factor (2 ans) 1.47 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2024-04-01T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/promoting-intimate-relationships-in-mental-illness/","title":"[Caiada et al., 2024] - Promoting Intimate Relationships in Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Interventions"},{"content":"Auteurs Simon FELIX\nRéférence complète Simon FELIX (2024). Pouvoir d’agir, droits et rétablissement dans les pratiques en santé mentale. Revue Générale de Droit Médical, n°90.\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\n","date":"2024-03-13T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/pouvoir-dagir-droits-et-rtablissement-dans-les-pra/","title":"[Felix, 2024] - Pouvoir d’agir, droits et rétablissement dans les pratiques en santé mentale"},{"content":"Auteurs Kevin-Marc Valery, Louis Violeau, Thomas Fournier, Meryl Caiada, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau\nRésumé de l\u0026rsquo;article The widespread adoption of head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality (VR) systems has emerged in various fields, including spatial learning research. This study investigated the effects of VR modality level of immersion, locomotion interface, and proprioception on spatial learning and physiological measures using eye-tracking (ET) in VR. We translated the classic T-maze task from Barnes et al. (Can J Psychol 34:29-39, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081022) to humans for the first time, comparing three VR modalities: 3D HMD VR with physical walking, 3D HMD VR with controller-based movement, and 2D desktop VR. Eighty-eight participants were recruited, and recruitment was stopped once 75 valid participants were obtained (25 per experimental condition) in the powered sample, as preregistered. Results of generalized mixed linear models with binomial distribution to assess learning outcomes revealed that human participants employed a mixture of cue, place, and response strategies when navigating the virtual T-maze, mirroring rodent behavior. In both samples, mixed linear models showed no significant differences between the two HMD VR conditions in learning performance, nor consistent ones in strategy choices. However, 2D desktop navigation was associated with slower initial learning, though this discrepancy diminished in subsequent sessions. These results were supported by spatial presence, immersion, and naturalness reports. Gaze measures showed that participants who physically walked devoted more visual attention to environmental cues compared to controller users. Predictive models for identifying spatial learning strategies based on ET and behavioral measures demonstrated significant accuracy in permutation tests in some models, particularly in the VR walking condition and second session. Our findings enhance the understanding of spatial learning strategies and the effects of VR modality on cognition and gaze behavior. This work demonstrates the potential of integrated ET data and holds implications for early detection and personalized rehabilitation of neurodegenerative conditions related to spatial cognition. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10055-025-01297-9.\nRéférence complète Kevin-Marc Valery, Louis Violeau, Thomas Fournier, Meryl Caiada, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau (2023). How do mental health professionals stigmatize incompetence in schizophrenia?. Stigma and Health. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000476\n🔗 Accéder à la publication\nJournal Journal Stigma and Health H-index 43 Impact Factor (2 ans) 0.88 Scimago Voir la fiche ","date":"2023-09-28T00:00:00Z","permalink":"/publications/how-do-mental-health-professionals-stigmatize-inco/","title":"[Valery et al., 2023] - How do mental health professionals stigmatize incompetence in schizophrenia?"}]