<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Self Report on Dr Simon FELIX</title>
        <link>https://simon-felix.netlify.app/tags/self-report/</link>
        <description>Recent content in Self Report on Dr Simon FELIX</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>fr-FR</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://simon-felix.netlify.app/tags/self-report/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
            <title>[Felix et al., 2024] - Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties</title>
            <link>https://simon-felix.netlify.app/publications/personal-recovery-selfreport-outcome-measures-in-s/</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>https://simon-felix.netlify.app/publications/personal-recovery-selfreport-outcome-measures-in-s/</guid>
            <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;auteurs&#34;&gt;Auteurs&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simon Felix, Kevin-Marc Valery, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;résumé-de-larticle&#34;&gt;Résumé de l&amp;rsquo;article&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personal recovery represents a paradigm shift in mental healthcare. Validated self-report outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to facilitate the transformation towards recovery-oriented practices and services. Objectives were to identify published measures and analyze their measurement properties using a standardized methodology. Following the COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of personal recovery PROMs in serious mental illness. The MEDLINE, PMC, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PBSC and Scopus electronic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and February 2024. Full-text articles from a previous systematic review were also examined. 91 studies were included in the review, describing 25 PROMs. Ten of them had not been identified in previous reviews. Quality of evidence was globally poor for most PROM measurement properties. Very little evidence was found for cross-cultural validity, measurement invariance, measurement error and criterion validity. The Recovery Assessment Scale and Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery showed the strongest evidence for sufficient psychometric data on a wide range of measurement properties. Several personal recovery measures are now available. While research is still needed to enhance their validity on some psychometric properties, the current tools appear sufficient to cover most research and clinical needs.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;référence-complète&#34;&gt;Référence complète&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simon Felix, Kevin-Marc Valery, Meryl Caiada, Sarah Guionnet, Julien Bonilla-Guerrero, Jean-Marc Destaillats, Antoinette Prouteau (2024). Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties. &lt;em&gt;Clinical Psychology Review&lt;/em&gt;.&#xA;&lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;🔗 Accéder à la publication&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;journal&#34;&gt;Journal&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;table&gt;&#xA;  &lt;thead&gt;&#xA;      &lt;tr&gt;&#xA;          &lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&#xA;          &lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&#xA;      &lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;  &lt;/thead&gt;&#xA;  &lt;tbody&gt;&#xA;      &lt;tr&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Journal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;https://www.journals.elsevier.com/clinical-psychology-review&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;Clinical Psychology Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;      &lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;      &lt;tr&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;H-index&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;334&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;      &lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;      &lt;tr&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Impact Factor (2 ans)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;6.65&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;      &lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;      &lt;tr&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scimago&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;          &lt;td&gt;&lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=0272-7358&amp;amp;tip=issn&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;Voir la fiche&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;      &lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;  &lt;/tbody&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;div style=&#34;display: flex; gap: 20px; align-items: center; flex-wrap: wrap;&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;div data-badge-type=&#34;medium-donut&#34; data-doi=&#34;10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&#34; class=&#34;altmetric-embed&#34;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;__dimensions_badge_embed__&#34; data-doi=&#34;10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&#34; data-style=&#34;small_rectangle&#34;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div&gt;&#xA;&lt;a href=&#34;https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459&#34;&#xA;   data-popup=&#34;right&#34;&#xA;   data-size=&#34;medium&#34;&#xA;   class=&#34;plumx-summary&#34;&#xA;   data-site=&#34;plum&#34;&#xA;   data-hide-when-empty=&#34;true&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;&lt;script type=&#34;text/javascript&#34; src=&#34;https://d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net/assets/embed.js&#34;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xA;&lt;script src=&#34;https://badge.dimensions.ai/badge.js&#34;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xA;&lt;script type=&#34;text/javascript&#34; src=&#34;https://cdn.plu.mx/widget-summary.js&#34;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xA;</description>
        </item></channel>
</rss>
